9 Responded To This Post

2366. Lord Kitchener's Own said on March 9, 2007 at 3:18 pm

Consider my hand raised.

High.

I particularly liked his reference to a post, “headlined: ‘When the State starts rounding up my Jewish neighbours, I’ll speak up.’” Has anyone seen this post? I distinctly remember a post of Robert’s called “Religious Reich Whingers” causing quite a stir earlier in the week, but I seem to have missed the post Kinsella is talking about. Must have been pretty juicy to warrant coverage in a national newspaper. Do you suppose Kinsella even went to MyBlagh before writing a commentary about it for the Post? (Plus, writing a commentary in a national newspaper about this, and naming Robert? Get a life Kinsella).

It’s like Warren (and Jason) don’t even realize they’re making even people who thought what Robert wrote was terrible start to feel a little disheartened, and to feel uneasy about the “side” they’ve chosen (such as it is). I totally stand by everything I’ve written on this little “scandal” but when I saw that piece in the Post, I immediately wanted to somehow express my outrage (but without appearing hypocritical, or as though by “defending” Robert somehow from THIS idiocy, I’d changed my mind on the original issue). Thanks Scott for a way/place/encouragement to do that.

Kinsella and Cherniak should both STFU now.

And Robert, if you’re reading this, I’d LOVE to post that sentiment in a comment to a MyBlagh post if you choose to write one about this (though I’d imagine you’re thoroughly sick of talking about it). I still totally disagree with what you wrote, and yadda, yadda, yadda, but man are Kinsella and Cherniak getting on my nerves. Kinsella especially. Cherniak at least is just blogging away. But a story in the National Post!?!?

Idiot.

2369. Mike said on March 9, 2007 at 10:23 pm

I raised mine the day it happened. I knew this was what Jason wanted and had no doubt Kinsella would be in on the dog pile.

This kind of smearing, its what these opportunists live for. Its why I was defending Rob at Jsaon’s blog that day.

2370. Matt Arnold said on March 9, 2007 at 11:08 pm

Warren is being Warren. He likes to spout off, and be very vocal about an issue that doesn’t deserve that sort of attention, but he is right, in a certain way. It would probably have been better to be a bit easier with his assessment, and maybe actually make some constructive comments, but I’m not totally offended by what he did.

2372. psychols said on March 10, 2007 at 12:12 am

Hand raised High.

2373. catnip said on March 10, 2007 at 12:48 am

Holy shit. Excuse my French. Kinsella wrote that article in the same newspaper that ran the fake “Iranian badges for Jews” story? Holy hypocrital hack.

2375. Ti-Guy said on March 10, 2007 at 10:02 am

Oh, for love of God. I hadn’t read Warren’s screech all that closely (he nauseates me and he’s dull) but that statement “On Sunday afternoon, there was a discussion on McClelland’s Web site headlined: “When the State starts rounding up my Jewish neighbours, I’ll speak up.” is factually dead wrong. It’s obvious Warren didn’t even bother reading the post or the comments, because that quote was my comment in the now-infamous thread, and I only meant it to mean that that I’m going to tolerate discussion up to a point until people’s civil rights are violated, which is what I objected to so strongly in Robert’s comment.

Warren Kinsella is a hack. Dishonest, lazy hack. I’d write The Post and demand a retraction, but I dont’ want a retraction. I want that glaring error to remain a testament to how simply awful the journalism of The Post and Warren Kinsella really is.

2377. Charlie Barnard said on March 10, 2007 at 11:29 am

“Some critics of Israel conveniently focus on Israeli wrongdoings to mask their blatant anti-Semitism.” Too often, these days, this sort of criticism has emanated from the left.

What a complete and utter load of crap. I can’t believe they pay this guy to write. What happened to fact based journalism. You remember what I’m talking about: the kind that actually refers to real life events accurately to back up the article. I haven’t seen any of that in a while.

2378. Steve V said on March 10, 2007 at 11:29 am

The funny part, if Robert is such a “nobody” as Warren claims in the article, why is he writing an article about the irrelevant guy?

2380. Ti-Guy said on March 10, 2007 at 1:28 pm

The funny part, if Robert is such a “nobody” as Warren claims in the article, why is he writing an article about the irrelevant guy?

That is always the question when Kinsella embarks on one of his witch-hunts. Why does he do it? What benefit is there in doing it? But this is bizarre; what purpose can be served by assassinating the character of a nobody?

Sorry the comment area are closed