9 Responded To This Post

3530. James said on April 22, 2007 at 6:50 pm

Meh, I’ve never been a big fan of pure PR, I think B.C. had the right idea with the STV system (Shame they didn’t get the threshold required). I could live with mixed-member PR if need be since it’s at least preferable over FPTP.

3531. Scott Tribe said on April 22, 2007 at 6:54 pm

No one I know of us who support electoral reforms are fans of pure PR.. I certainly am not.. and I know Greg isn’t. I think a lot of the bloggers on the NDP/Green side of the ledger don’t either.

3533. knb said on April 22, 2007 at 8:09 pm

Hmmm, I confess that I am sorely uninformed on this subject. I guess I’m going to have to read up and ask a lot of questions Scott, if you’ll indulge me.

3535. Scott Tribe said on April 22, 2007 at 8:21 pm

By all means… I’m a bit of a wonk when it comes to pressing for PR. Searching my blogsite on the topic as well as my diaries at Prog Blog as well as my past entries at BlogsCanada would let you find a divvy of info :)

3536. knb said on April 22, 2007 at 8:29 pm

Thanks Scott. I’ll start my research. I am an artist though, so this may take some time, lol.

3544. Aaron Unruh said on April 23, 2007 at 2:10 am

I don’t mean to constantly throw cold water on you, but this is not a promise to be taken seriously. SMP has been the key to Liberal dominance at the national level over the course of the 20th century. Dion knows this as well as anyone, and even if he did try he would be removed as leader long before he could ever implement reforms.

Not that that would stop him from making promises of electoral reform. I’m sure that he can lie as well as any of his predecessors.

3547. Greg said on April 23, 2007 at 9:36 am

It’s a pretty tepid “endorsement”. It’s a promise to study the idea of thinking about electoral reform. Also,mentioning Israel as his example of PR did not fill me with much confidence in his enthusiasm for the subject.

3554. Scott Tribe said on April 23, 2007 at 12:55 pm

He’s mentioning that Greg in the context of not liking a pure PR setup. As I said though… most of us on this side of the aisle (and I daresay a lot on the NDP and Green side) never wanted pure PR anyhow - though he seems to imply that’s the format May and the Greens want.

A form of Mixed Member PR is what most of us (and what Dion appears to like as well) advocate as being the best setup for an electoral system in Canada.

3561. Greg said on April 23, 2007 at 1:18 pm

As I said though… most of us on this side of the aisle (and I daresay a lot on the NDP and Green side) never wanted pure PR anyhow

Exactly so there was really no reason to bring Israel up other than to send a “PR is scary” signal out to the audience. If Dion really supports electoral reform, bravo, but I will have to see much more definite statements from him on the subject. More importantly, I will have to see much more openness to project by the rest of the party (excluding yourself) before I believe you guys are actually allies here.

Sorry the comment area are closed