Comments on: Naive Con Kool-Aid drinkers takes Pierre Polivere’s statements as the Gospel http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/02/naive-con-kool-aid-drinkers-takes-pierre-poliveres-statements-as-the-gospel/ My personal opinions on social and political issues from a progressive standpoint. Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:57:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Scott Tribe http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/02/naive-con-kool-aid-drinkers-takes-pierre-poliveres-statements-as-the-gospel/#comment-14832 Scott Tribe Fri, 02 May 2008 22:47:34 +0000 http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1254#comment-14832 Uh.. Mike.. read the poll #'s a bit more carefully. 58% disbelieve the Cons. - only 26% believe them. TWENTY - SIX PERCENT. Let me make it simpler for you to understand - only 26% believe them, as compared to 36% who voted for them the last election. I'll take the 58% in a general election if you don't want it Mike. I'll even give the Cons the 26% of Canadians vote that do believe them. It will serve the same purpose - a crushing defeat. Try reading the link a bit better before you comment next time, Mike. It will make you look less silly. (You'll also see the pollster calls it "overwhelming #'s" if you bother to read).<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14832','Scott Tribe'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14832','Scott Tribe','Uh.. Mike.. read the poll #\'s a bit more carefully. 58% disbelieve the Cons. - only 26% believe them.\r\n\r\nTWENTY - SIX PERCENT. \r\n\r\nLet me make it simpler for you to understand - only 26% believe them, as compared to 36% who voted for them the last election.\r\n\r\nI\'ll take the 58% in a general election if you don\'t want it Mike. I\'ll even give the Cons the 26% of Canadians vote that do believe them. It will serve the same purpose - a crushing defeat.\r\n\r\nTry reading the link a bit better before you comment next time, Mike. It will make you look less silly. (You\'ll also see the pollster calls it \"overwhelming #\'s\" if you bother to read).'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Uh.. Mike.. read the poll #’s a bit more carefully. 58% disbelieve the Cons. - only 26% believe them.

TWENTY - SIX PERCENT.

Let me make it simpler for you to understand - only 26% believe them, as compared to 36% who voted for them the last election.

I’ll take the 58% in a general election if you don’t want it Mike. I’ll even give the Cons the 26% of Canadians vote that do believe them. It will serve the same purpose - a crushing defeat.

Try reading the link a bit better before you comment next time, Mike. It will make you look less silly. (You’ll also see the pollster calls it “overwhelming #’s” if you bother to read).

Reply - Quote
]]> By: Mike Harris http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/02/naive-con-kool-aid-drinkers-takes-pierre-poliveres-statements-as-the-gospel/#comment-14831 Mike Harris Fri, 02 May 2008 22:15:28 +0000 http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1254#comment-14831 Geez Lord..you call 58% an OVERWHELMING majority? That is just over half?? My self and I'm sure a MAJORITY of people would call anything over and this is my own thought..say 75% a overwhelming majority!<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14831','Mike Harris'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14831','Mike Harris','Geez Lord..you call 58% an OVERWHELMING majority? That is just over half?? My self and I\'m sure a MAJORITY of people would call anything over and this is my own thought..say 75% a overwhelming majority!'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Geez Lord..you call 58% an OVERWHELMING majority? That is just over half?? My self and I’m sure a MAJORITY of people would call anything over and this is my own thought..say 75% a overwhelming majority!
Reply - Quote
]]> By: Walkswithcoffee http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/02/naive-con-kool-aid-drinkers-takes-pierre-poliveres-statements-as-the-gospel/#comment-14830 Walkswithcoffee Fri, 02 May 2008 20:35:12 +0000 http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1254#comment-14830 Money Laundering and Free Speech have nothing to do with each other. They are two entirely different activities.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14830','Walkswithcoffee'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14830','Walkswithcoffee','Money Laundering and Free Speech have nothing to do with each other. They are two entirely different activities.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Money Laundering and Free Speech have nothing to do with each other. They are two entirely different activities.
Reply - Quote
]]> By: Sandi http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/02/naive-con-kool-aid-drinkers-takes-pierre-poliveres-statements-as-the-gospel/#comment-14828 Sandi Fri, 02 May 2008 19:34:11 +0000 http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1254#comment-14828 I saw two journalists on CPAC last night - I can't remember the name of one of them, but one was Elizabeth Thompson - both said that they followed up on Polievres claims - he is definately miseleading people.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14828','Sandi'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14828','Sandi','I saw two journalists on CPAC last night - I can\'t remember the name of one of them, but one was Elizabeth Thompson - both said that they followed up on Polievres claims - he is definately miseleading people.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> I saw two journalists on CPAC last night - I can’t remember the name of one of them, but one was Elizabeth Thompson - both said that they followed up on Polievres claims - he is definately miseleading people.
Reply - Quote
]]> By: Lord Kitchener's Own http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/02/naive-con-kool-aid-drinkers-takes-pierre-poliveres-statements-as-the-gospel/#comment-14827 Lord Kitchener's Own Fri, 02 May 2008 19:30:14 +0000 http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1254#comment-14827 GEEZ Mike, the article on the poll is a whole TWO CLICKS away from this post and you couldn't be bothered??? <a href="http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics/2008/04/30/5431926-cp.html" rel="nofollow">Here</a>. Is that better? 58% of Canadians don't believe that the Tories did nothing wrong. A whopping 26% do.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14827','Lord Kitchener\'s Own'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14827','Lord Kitchener\'s Own','GEEZ Mike, the article on the poll is a whole TWO CLICKS away from this post and you couldn\'t be bothered???\r\n\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/cnews.canoe.ca\/CNEWS\/Politics\/2008\/04\/30\/5431926-cp.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">Here<\/a>. Is that better?\r\n\r\n58% of Canadians don\'t believe that the Tories did nothing wrong. A whopping 26% do.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> GEEZ Mike, the article on the poll is a whole TWO CLICKS away from this post and you couldn’t be bothered???

Here. Is that better?

58% of Canadians don’t believe that the Tories did nothing wrong. A whopping 26% do.

Reply - Quote
]]> By: Mike Harris http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/02/naive-con-kool-aid-drinkers-takes-pierre-poliveres-statements-as-the-gospel/#comment-14826 Mike Harris Fri, 02 May 2008 19:17:03 +0000 http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1254#comment-14826 Scott.....good blog(ya) but i would like to see the data that you claim the majority of canadains? did you perhaps mean the majority of canadian liberals that you talk to?<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14826','Mike Harris'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14826','Mike Harris','Scott.....good blog(ya) but i would like to see the data that you claim the majority of canadains? did you perhaps mean the majority of canadian liberals that you talk to?'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Scott…..good blog(ya) but i would like to see the data that you claim the majority of canadains? did you perhaps mean the majority of canadian liberals that you talk to?
Reply - Quote
]]>