<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In and Out, the Sequel? Part 2?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/03/in-and-out-the-sequel-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/03/in-and-out-the-sequel-part-2/</link>
	<description>My personal opinions on social and political issues from a progressive standpoint.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/03/in-and-out-the-sequel-part-2/#comment-14870</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1258#comment-14870</guid>
		<description>Ha ha, Colin, you were duped! Conservatives are theives, just like the Liberals.

I bet you feel really stupid right now, don't you?

Hey, why don't these guys take responsibility for their actions? Last I checked "but everyone else did it" is not a n excuse for committing wrong acts. 

Sucker.&lt;div class="comment-remix-meta"&gt;&lt;a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14870','Mike'); return false;"&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14870','Mike','Ha ha, Colin, you were duped! Conservatives are theives, just like the Liberals.\r\n\r\nI bet you feel really stupid right now, don\'t you?\r\n\r\nHey, why don\'t these guys take responsibility for their actions? Last I checked \&#34;but everyone else did it\&#34; is not a n excuse for committing wrong acts. \r\n\r\nSucker.'); return false;"&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha, Colin, you were duped! Conservatives are theives, just like the Liberals.</p>
<p>I bet you feel really stupid right now, don&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>Hey, why don&#8217;t these guys take responsibility for their actions? Last I checked &#8220;but everyone else did it&#8221; is not a n excuse for committing wrong acts. </p>
<p>Sucker.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14870','Mike'); return false;">Reply</a>  - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14870','Mike','Ha ha, Colin, you were duped! Conservatives are theives, just like the Liberals.\r\n\r\nI bet you feel really stupid right now, don\'t you?\r\n\r\nHey, why don\'t these guys take responsibility for their actions? Last I checked \&quot;but everyone else did it\&quot; is not a n excuse for committing wrong acts. \r\n\r\nSucker.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/03/in-and-out-the-sequel-part-2/#comment-14867</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 04:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1258#comment-14867</guid>
		<description>Still into that comparing thing are you? Still ignoring the fact that no one is saying that "In and Out" is as bad as sponsorship.

And gee, the other political parties think the liberals owe more. Wow - that means so much. I think we should give the LPC the same consideration the CPC is seeking - the benefit of the doubt. When you come up with, you know, evidence, I will be persuaded. If you say I am wrong, bring evidence to the table.

In any event, who cares. This post is about the wrongdoing of the CPC, and their complete and utter failure to own up to that...you know, be accountable, take responsibility, behave like adults...&lt;div class="comment-remix-meta"&gt;&lt;a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14867','Gayle'); return false;"&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14867','Gayle','Still into that comparing thing are you? Still ignoring the fact that no one is saying that \&#34;In and Out\&#34; is as bad as sponsorship.\r\n\r\nAnd gee, the other political parties think the liberals owe more. Wow - that means so much. I think we should give the LPC the same consideration the CPC is seeking - the benefit of the doubt. When you come up with, you know, evidence, I will be persuaded. If you say I am wrong, bring evidence to the table.\r\n\r\nIn any event, who cares. This post is about the wrongdoing of the CPC, and their complete and utter failure to own up to that...you know, be accountable, take responsibility, behave like adults...'); return false;"&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still into that comparing thing are you? Still ignoring the fact that no one is saying that &#8220;In and Out&#8221; is as bad as sponsorship.</p>
<p>And gee, the other political parties think the liberals owe more. Wow - that means so much. I think we should give the LPC the same consideration the CPC is seeking - the benefit of the doubt. When you come up with, you know, evidence, I will be persuaded. If you say I am wrong, bring evidence to the table.</p>
<p>In any event, who cares. This post is about the wrongdoing of the CPC, and their complete and utter failure to own up to that&#8230;you know, be accountable, take responsibility, behave like adults&#8230;
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14867','Gayle'); return false;">Reply</a>  - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14867','Gayle','Still into that comparing thing are you? Still ignoring the fact that no one is saying that \&quot;In and Out\&quot; is as bad as sponsorship.\r\n\r\nAnd gee, the other political parties think the liberals owe more. Wow - that means so much. I think we should give the LPC the same consideration the CPC is seeking - the benefit of the doubt. When you come up with, you know, evidence, I will be persuaded. If you say I am wrong, bring evidence to the table.\r\n\r\nIn any event, who cares. This post is about the wrongdoing of the CPC, and their complete and utter failure to own up to that...you know, be accountable, take responsibility, behave like adults...'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/03/in-and-out-the-sequel-part-2/#comment-14866</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 01:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1258#comment-14866</guid>
		<description>"Liberals call an inquiry, and make full restitution"

That is open to interpretation too. According to CPC,NDP and the Bloc the Liberals are still owing the taxpayer millions of dollars.

That statement is wrong on so many levels I seriously hope you dont believe it.

Dont peddle crap like that...And if you think that envelopes stuffed with 20's can be audited...&lt;div class="comment-remix-meta"&gt;&lt;a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14866','Colin'); return false;"&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14866','Colin','\&#34;Liberals call an inquiry, and make full restitution\&#34;\r\n\r\nThat is open to interpretation too. According to CPC,NDP and the Bloc the Liberals are still owing the taxpayer millions of dollars.\r\n\r\nThat statement is wrong on so many levels I seriously hope you dont believe it.\r\n\r\nDont peddle crap like that...And if you think that envelopes stuffed with 20\'s can be audited...'); return false;"&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Liberals call an inquiry, and make full restitution&#8221;</p>
<p>That is open to interpretation too. According to CPC,NDP and the Bloc the Liberals are still owing the taxpayer millions of dollars.</p>
<p>That statement is wrong on so many levels I seriously hope you dont believe it.</p>
<p>Dont peddle crap like that&#8230;And if you think that envelopes stuffed with 20&#8217;s can be audited&#8230;
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14866','Colin'); return false;">Reply</a>  - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14866','Colin','\&quot;Liberals call an inquiry, and make full restitution\&quot;\r\n\r\nThat is open to interpretation too. According to CPC,NDP and the Bloc the Liberals are still owing the taxpayer millions of dollars.\r\n\r\nThat statement is wrong on so many levels I seriously hope you dont believe it.\r\n\r\nDont peddle crap like that...And if you think that envelopes stuffed with 20\'s can be audited...'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/03/in-and-out-the-sequel-part-2/#comment-14865</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 01:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1258#comment-14865</guid>
		<description>"But dont confuse EC with the courts. They arent, and they dont like that fact much."

And you base this on...

That is right, you have nothing to base this on. EC are doing their jobs. I have yet to hear anything from them that suggests they think they should be the final authority on anything.

In any event, I think it is wrong for us to concentrate on whether the CPC will get "off" on a technicality. Anyone who reads the affidavit can see they exploited a loophole in order to act in a manner that contradicts the spirit and intent of the spending cap - and then claimed my money (and your money) as a rebate.

So again, let us compare (since you are in to that):

Liberals call an inquiry, and make full restitution

CPC tell their candidates to shut up, deliberately mistate the facts, sue for 700 thousand tax dollars, and whine about unfair treatment rather than "man up" and take responsibility.&lt;div class="comment-remix-meta"&gt;&lt;a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14865','Gayle'); return false;"&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14865','Gayle','\&#34;But dont confuse EC with the courts. They arent, and they dont like that fact much.\&#34;\r\n\r\nAnd you base this on...\r\n\r\nThat is right, you have nothing to base this on. EC are doing their jobs. I have yet to hear anything from them that suggests they think they should be the final authority on anything.\r\n\r\nIn any event, I think it is wrong for us to concentrate on whether the CPC will get \&#34;off\&#34; on a technicality. Anyone who reads the affidavit can see they exploited a loophole in order to act in a manner that contradicts the spirit and intent of the spending cap - and then claimed my money (and your money) as a rebate.\r\n\r\nSo again, let us compare (since you are in to that):\r\n\r\nLiberals call an inquiry, and make full restitution\r\n\r\nCPC tell their candidates to shut up, deliberately mistate the facts, sue for 700 thousand tax dollars, and whine about unfair treatment rather than \&#34;man up\&#34; and take responsibility.'); return false;"&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But dont confuse EC with the courts. They arent, and they dont like that fact much.&#8221;</p>
<p>And you base this on&#8230;</p>
<p>That is right, you have nothing to base this on. EC are doing their jobs. I have yet to hear anything from them that suggests they think they should be the final authority on anything.</p>
<p>In any event, I think it is wrong for us to concentrate on whether the CPC will get &#8220;off&#8221; on a technicality. Anyone who reads the affidavit can see they exploited a loophole in order to act in a manner that contradicts the spirit and intent of the spending cap - and then claimed my money (and your money) as a rebate.</p>
<p>So again, let us compare (since you are in to that):</p>
<p>Liberals call an inquiry, and make full restitution</p>
<p>CPC tell their candidates to shut up, deliberately mistate the facts, sue for 700 thousand tax dollars, and whine about unfair treatment rather than &#8220;man up&#8221; and take responsibility.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14865','Gayle'); return false;">Reply</a>  - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14865','Gayle','\&quot;But dont confuse EC with the courts. They arent, and they dont like that fact much.\&quot;\r\n\r\nAnd you base this on...\r\n\r\nThat is right, you have nothing to base this on. EC are doing their jobs. I have yet to hear anything from them that suggests they think they should be the final authority on anything.\r\n\r\nIn any event, I think it is wrong for us to concentrate on whether the CPC will get \&quot;off\&quot; on a technicality. Anyone who reads the affidavit can see they exploited a loophole in order to act in a manner that contradicts the spirit and intent of the spending cap - and then claimed my money (and your money) as a rebate.\r\n\r\nSo again, let us compare (since you are in to that):\r\n\r\nLiberals call an inquiry, and make full restitution\r\n\r\nCPC tell their candidates to shut up, deliberately mistate the facts, sue for 700 thousand tax dollars, and whine about unfair treatment rather than \&quot;man up\&quot; and take responsibility.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/03/in-and-out-the-sequel-part-2/#comment-14863</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 23:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1258#comment-14863</guid>
		<description>You must not have read the last paragraph. I didnt say the CPC were exonerated. I said it will go before the courts. You can argue speeding tickets too.

Elections Canada made an allegation and now they will have to prove it in court. But dont confuse EC with the courts. They arent, and they dont like that fact much.

As for comparing this to Adscam, one is the most offensive fraud perpetrated on Canadians and the other is a dispute between a governmental agency and a political party.

But to inflate this dispute into a scandal insults the intelligence of most ordinary voters and turns them off to the Liberals.&lt;div class="comment-remix-meta"&gt;&lt;a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14863','Colin'); return false;"&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14863','Colin','You must not have read the last paragraph. I didnt say the CPC were exonerated. I said it will go before the courts. You can argue speeding tickets too.\r\n\r\nElections Canada made an allegation and now they will have to prove it in court. But dont confuse EC with the courts. They arent, and they dont like that fact much.\r\n\r\nAs for comparing this to Adscam, one is the most offensive fraud perpetrated on Canadians and the other is a dispute between a governmental agency and a political party.\r\n\r\nBut to inflate this dispute into a scandal insults the intelligence of most ordinary voters and turns them off to the Liberals.'); return false;"&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must not have read the last paragraph. I didnt say the CPC were exonerated. I said it will go before the courts. You can argue speeding tickets too.</p>
<p>Elections Canada made an allegation and now they will have to prove it in court. But dont confuse EC with the courts. They arent, and they dont like that fact much.</p>
<p>As for comparing this to Adscam, one is the most offensive fraud perpetrated on Canadians and the other is a dispute between a governmental agency and a political party.</p>
<p>But to inflate this dispute into a scandal insults the intelligence of most ordinary voters and turns them off to the Liberals.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14863','Colin'); return false;">Reply</a>  - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14863','Colin','You must not have read the last paragraph. I didnt say the CPC were exonerated. I said it will go before the courts. You can argue speeding tickets too.\r\n\r\nElections Canada made an allegation and now they will have to prove it in court. But dont confuse EC with the courts. They arent, and they dont like that fact much.\r\n\r\nAs for comparing this to Adscam, one is the most offensive fraud perpetrated on Canadians and the other is a dispute between a governmental agency and a political party.\r\n\r\nBut to inflate this dispute into a scandal insults the intelligence of most ordinary voters and turns them off to the Liberals.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/03/in-and-out-the-sequel-part-2/#comment-14862</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 21:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1258#comment-14862</guid>
		<description>malarkey?

How about the malarkey about comparing this to sponsorship - like somehow that exonerates the CPC.

Harper is behaving like a child who refuses to take responsibility for his own behaviour. Deal with it.&lt;div class="comment-remix-meta"&gt;&lt;a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14862','Gayle'); return false;"&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14862','Gayle','malarkey?\r\n\r\nHow about the malarkey about comparing this to sponsorship - like somehow that exonerates the CPC.\r\n\r\nHarper is behaving like a child who refuses to take responsibility for his own behaviour. Deal with it.'); return false;"&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>malarkey?</p>
<p>How about the malarkey about comparing this to sponsorship - like somehow that exonerates the CPC.</p>
<p>Harper is behaving like a child who refuses to take responsibility for his own behaviour. Deal with it.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14862','Gayle'); return false;">Reply</a>  - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14862','Gayle','malarkey?\r\n\r\nHow about the malarkey about comparing this to sponsorship - like somehow that exonerates the CPC.\r\n\r\nHarper is behaving like a child who refuses to take responsibility for his own behaviour. Deal with it.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/03/in-and-out-the-sequel-part-2/#comment-14860</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 19:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1258#comment-14860</guid>
		<description>Actually Gayle you are dead wrong but A for effort on the spin.

Martin investigated Chretien. It wasnt out of a genuine desire to put things right. It was part of their ongoing feud.

And there is still the matter of repayment and jail time for senior Liberal operatives. Dont give me the malarkey about paying it back.

The dispute the conservatives have with Elections Canada is more of an accounting treatment. This is not a criminal action and the courts will decide who is right. Elections Canada will have to justify their actions in court as will the conservatives, but to suggest that EC is the final arbiter of right and wrong is incorrect.&lt;div class="comment-remix-meta"&gt;&lt;a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14860','Colin'); return false;"&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14860','Colin','Actually Gayle you are dead wrong but A for effort on the spin.\r\n\r\nMartin investigated Chretien. It wasnt out of a genuine desire to put things right. It was part of their ongoing feud.\r\n\r\nAnd there is still the matter of repayment and jail time for senior Liberal operatives. Dont give me the malarkey about paying it back.\r\n\r\nThe dispute the conservatives have with Elections Canada is more of an accounting treatment. This is not a criminal action and the courts will decide who is right. Elections Canada will have to justify their actions in court as will the conservatives, but to suggest that EC is the final arbiter of right and wrong is incorrect.'); return false;"&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Gayle you are dead wrong but A for effort on the spin.</p>
<p>Martin investigated Chretien. It wasnt out of a genuine desire to put things right. It was part of their ongoing feud.</p>
<p>And there is still the matter of repayment and jail time for senior Liberal operatives. Dont give me the malarkey about paying it back.</p>
<p>The dispute the conservatives have with Elections Canada is more of an accounting treatment. This is not a criminal action and the courts will decide who is right. Elections Canada will have to justify their actions in court as will the conservatives, but to suggest that EC is the final arbiter of right and wrong is incorrect.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14860','Colin'); return false;">Reply</a>  - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14860','Colin','Actually Gayle you are dead wrong but A for effort on the spin.\r\n\r\nMartin investigated Chretien. It wasnt out of a genuine desire to put things right. It was part of their ongoing feud.\r\n\r\nAnd there is still the matter of repayment and jail time for senior Liberal operatives. Dont give me the malarkey about paying it back.\r\n\r\nThe dispute the conservatives have with Elections Canada is more of an accounting treatment. This is not a criminal action and the courts will decide who is right. Elections Canada will have to justify their actions in court as will the conservatives, but to suggest that EC is the final arbiter of right and wrong is incorrect.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/03/in-and-out-the-sequel-part-2/#comment-14859</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1258#comment-14859</guid>
		<description>"Can anyone explain how accounting differences are on the same level as actually stealing money through phoney Ad Buys to pay for elections?"

Did anyone say otherwise? 

What IS telling is the different way each party handled this. The liberals call an enquiry, open the books and pay the money back.

The cons start pointing fingers, making false allegations about other parties and fall into "victim" mode.

If your 8 year old was consequenced at school and complained about it because "teacher picks on me", would you tell her she has to be accountable for her own actions, or would you sue the teacher.&lt;div class="comment-remix-meta"&gt;&lt;a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14859','Gayle'); return false;"&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14859','Gayle','\&#34;Can anyone explain how accounting differences are on the same level as actually stealing money through phoney Ad Buys to pay for elections?\&#34;\r\n\r\nDid anyone say otherwise? \r\n\r\nWhat IS telling is the different way each party handled this. The liberals call an enquiry, open the books and pay the money back.\r\n\r\nThe cons start pointing fingers, making false allegations about other parties and fall into \&#34;victim\&#34; mode.\r\n\r\nIf your 8 year old was consequenced at school and complained about it because \&#34;teacher picks on me\&#34;, would you tell her she has to be accountable for her own actions, or would you sue the teacher.'); return false;"&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Can anyone explain how accounting differences are on the same level as actually stealing money through phoney Ad Buys to pay for elections?&#8221;</p>
<p>Did anyone say otherwise? </p>
<p>What IS telling is the different way each party handled this. The liberals call an enquiry, open the books and pay the money back.</p>
<p>The cons start pointing fingers, making false allegations about other parties and fall into &#8220;victim&#8221; mode.</p>
<p>If your 8 year old was consequenced at school and complained about it because &#8220;teacher picks on me&#8221;, would you tell her she has to be accountable for her own actions, or would you sue the teacher.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14859','Gayle'); return false;">Reply</a>  - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14859','Gayle','\&quot;Can anyone explain how accounting differences are on the same level as actually stealing money through phoney Ad Buys to pay for elections?\&quot;\r\n\r\nDid anyone say otherwise? \r\n\r\nWhat IS telling is the different way each party handled this. The liberals call an enquiry, open the books and pay the money back.\r\n\r\nThe cons start pointing fingers, making false allegations about other parties and fall into \&quot;victim\&quot; mode.\r\n\r\nIf your 8 year old was consequenced at school and complained about it because \&quot;teacher picks on me\&quot;, would you tell her she has to be accountable for her own actions, or would you sue the teacher.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/03/in-and-out-the-sequel-part-2/#comment-14857</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 14:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1258#comment-14857</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott,
I hope that this example of the NDP holding the cons to account puts paid to the LPC whining that the NDP is only criticizing the LPC and not going after the cons for their myriad of scandals. This along with important policy fights such as the sale of MDA, Jack's Enviro bill, the fight against C10, andvoting against a regressive budget with a hidden anti-democratic immigration reform, etc etc etc shows that the NDP is offering real opposition to this government, unlike the 'sit on our hands' Liberal caucus.&lt;div class="comment-remix-meta"&gt;&lt;a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14857','j'); return false;"&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14857','j','Hey Scott,\r\nI hope that this example of the NDP holding the cons to account puts paid to the LPC whining that the NDP is only criticizing the LPC and not going after the cons for their myriad of scandals. This along with important policy fights such as the sale of MDA, Jack\'s Enviro bill, the fight against C10, andvoting against a regressive budget with a hidden anti-democratic immigration reform, etc etc etc shows that the NDP is offering real opposition to this government, unlike the \'sit on our hands\' Liberal caucus.'); return false;"&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott,<br />
I hope that this example of the NDP holding the cons to account puts paid to the LPC whining that the NDP is only criticizing the LPC and not going after the cons for their myriad of scandals. This along with important policy fights such as the sale of MDA, Jack&#8217;s Enviro bill, the fight against C10, andvoting against a regressive budget with a hidden anti-democratic immigration reform, etc etc etc shows that the NDP is offering real opposition to this government, unlike the &#8217;sit on our hands&#8217; Liberal caucus.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14857','j'); return false;">Reply</a>  - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14857','j','Hey Scott,\r\nI hope that this example of the NDP holding the cons to account puts paid to the LPC whining that the NDP is only criticizing the LPC and not going after the cons for their myriad of scandals. This along with important policy fights such as the sale of MDA, Jack\'s Enviro bill, the fight against C10, andvoting against a regressive budget with a hidden anti-democratic immigration reform, etc etc etc shows that the NDP is offering real opposition to this government, unlike the \'sit on our hands\' Liberal caucus.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2008/05/03/in-and-out-the-sequel-part-2/#comment-14854</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 06:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/?p=1258#comment-14854</guid>
		<description>Can anyone explain how accounting differences are on the same level as actually stealing money through phoney Ad Buys to pay for elections?

I mean, flat broke Quebec liberals bought two elections with cash filled brown envelopes. They were supplied through a kickback scheme invented and devised by senior advisers to Jean Chretien.

Without these cash filled envelopes many Quebec Liberals could not have funded their campaign offices. Talk about a scandal. 

And you idiots think an accounting scheme is going to shift votes...

Get used to the hinterland. 

You guys are fucked.&lt;div class="comment-remix-meta"&gt;&lt;a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14854','Colin'); return false;"&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14854','Colin','Can anyone explain how accounting differences are on the same level as actually stealing money through phoney Ad Buys to pay for elections?\r\n\r\nI mean, flat broke Quebec liberals bought two elections with cash filled brown envelopes. They were supplied through a kickback scheme invented and devised by senior advisers to Jean Chretien.\r\n\r\nWithout these cash filled envelopes many Quebec Liberals could not have funded their campaign offices. Talk about a scandal. \r\n\r\nAnd you idiots think an accounting scheme is going to shift votes...\r\n\r\nGet used to the hinterland. \r\n\r\nYou guys are fucked.'); return false;"&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone explain how accounting differences are on the same level as actually stealing money through phoney Ad Buys to pay for elections?</p>
<p>I mean, flat broke Quebec liberals bought two elections with cash filled brown envelopes. They were supplied through a kickback scheme invented and devised by senior advisers to Jean Chretien.</p>
<p>Without these cash filled envelopes many Quebec Liberals could not have funded their campaign offices. Talk about a scandal. </p>
<p>And you idiots think an accounting scheme is going to shift votes&#8230;</p>
<p>Get used to the hinterland. </p>
<p>You guys are fucked.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('14854','Colin'); return false;">Reply</a>  - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('14854','Colin','Can anyone explain how accounting differences are on the same level as actually stealing money through phoney Ad Buys to pay for elections?\r\n\r\nI mean, flat broke Quebec liberals bought two elections with cash filled brown envelopes. They were supplied through a kickback scheme invented and devised by senior advisers to Jean Chretien.\r\n\r\nWithout these cash filled envelopes many Quebec Liberals could not have funded their campaign offices. Talk about a scandal. \r\n\r\nAnd you idiots think an accounting scheme is going to shift votes...\r\n\r\nGet used to the hinterland. \r\n\r\nYou guys are fucked.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.250 seconds -->
