14 Responded To This Post

15985. gretag said on August 20, 2008 at 11:19 am

I doubt that polling is legitimate. The company has polled for prolife groups and it has been pointed out that they have a login on blogging tories. Probably it is to the advantage of the Tories to have people think the Libs are way ahead and meanwhile the CPC will make sure they get out their votes. This will be a closer race between the Libs and Tories, and the Tories could take it.

15987. Calgary Grit said on August 20, 2008 at 12:07 pm

A 3400 sample in Guelph?

Nu-uh - this one doesn’t pass the sniff test.

15988. jeff davidson said on August 20, 2008 at 12:08 pm

@gretag - this poll is a con job. pro-life advocates posing as pollsters attempting to lull liberals asleep.

15989. gretag said on August 20, 2008 at 12:16 pm

I see there is a lot of info on this polling company at unrepentant old hippie and other sites.

http://unrepentantoldhippie.blogspot.com/2008/07/massive-poll-somethings-up.html

15990. The Zoe Category said on August 20, 2008 at 12:19 pm

Are you kidding me? Why are we listening to any numbers this KlrVu Research company says? (Even if positive…).

15991. Torontonian said on August 20, 2008 at 12:37 pm

It’ll take quite some time for KlrVu
to redeem itself even after it divorces
itself from the conservative party.

Until then, any research from them
is about as meaningful and valid
as shares of Bre-X.

15986. Sean S. said on August 20, 2008 at 12:50 pm

interesting…though doing it over a 2 week span leaves alot of error that isn’t accounted for. I am curious to see if the Green Party numbers hold, even more so if they can translate those type of numbers in a general election.

15992. Scott Tribe said on August 20, 2008 at 1:13 pm

Hi folks: Thanks for reminding me about that polling firm and the controversy over the Morgentaler polling. I’ve done an update to the original post.

15993. Scott Tribe said on August 20, 2008 at 1:27 pm

I will just add however, that I still stick to my statement in the blogpost that touch-tone polling -at least as its been done in the USA by SurveyUSA - has had pretty accurate results. There were other things involved in that massive poll that this polling firm did for the pro-life groups that put it under scrutiny, as JJ at her blog and a host of others have pointed out.

15995. Torontonian said on August 20, 2008 at 1:41 pm

Conducting any poll over a 2-week span can hardly be considered accurate.

People change their views from day to day and the shorter the time frame for the poll, the more accurate it is in catching the mood of the masses.

A couple of negative press releases in a couple of days can dramatically shift the mood–and the poll results.

15996. Deb Prothero said on August 20, 2008 at 2:46 pm

Not buying anything this outfit has to sell. The Unrepentant Hippie discovered KlrVu is owned by the brother-in-law of a Con MP. Don’t give this poll or the company any hits. We don’t want this kind of manipulation of polling numbers during general elections.

15998. mushroom said on August 20, 2008 at 3:53 pm

A “fictitious” poll designed to encourage the pro-lifers to support Kovach. Expect to see the “Dion kills babies” flyers appearing in the parking lots of Catholic churches this Sunday.

15999. Saskboy said on August 20, 2008 at 3:59 pm

I’m not going to by the numbers at all. If it reflects the result, it will be by fluke only.

Guelph should really consider the limited value in electing a Liberal over a Green this time, especially when it’s unlikely the MP will be working more than a couple months. A Green MP would clinch a televised debate spot for Elizabeth May, and any other party’s victory is unlikely to have any impact at all on the riding or on the country.

Track & Pingback

Trackback and pingback from other blogger

Sorry the comment area are closed