5 Responded To This Post

16175. ALW said on September 3, 2008 at 5:07 pm

Scott, does it not bother you that the nature of the “contingency fund” proposed by Dion is effectively a subsidy which works to undermine the very purpose of the Green Shift in the first place? The entire policy is premised on incentives for shifting away from bad, environmentally damaging behaviour towards good, environmentally conscious behaviour. Dion has just conceded to subsidize the former because pushing people to the latter would have made people mad!

An analogy: suppose you proposed a policy to try to get people out of their cars and onto buses and trains by taxing car driving and making transit passes tax free. What Dion has done here is the equivalent of caving into car drivers who are complaining they don’t like it!

You know, the Green Shift, as a policy, would have been totally defensible if the Liberals had not attempted to dress it up as cost-free to everyone. It’s not. Some people will indeed pay more. Indeed, that’s the very point: it’s a “sin tax” in a way. But instead, Dion has tried to oversell it as some magical, cost-free way of having everyone benefit, and now he’s getting clobbered for it.

16176. Jim said on September 3, 2008 at 5:32 pm

Funny, you call in listening…I call it pandering.

Do anything, say anything, pander to large petro consumers to protect the ridings of guys such as Goodale…nothing new from the Liberals.

What happened to “not one comma”?

Flip flop…the body now controls the head.

I can hardly wait for election night to see this dog be put down.

16177. Gayle said on September 3, 2008 at 7:49 pm

“What happened to “not one comma”?”

Do you have a qute where he actually said that (and I am not referring to the anonymous liberal insider).

16178. Demosthenes said on September 4, 2008 at 3:15 am

For the trolls: that press release points out, quite clearly, that these measures are to provide incentives for green investment. Hardly “pandering.”

(Pandering would be, say, claiming that you can drill your way out of high gas prices.)

Jeff: Remember, Harper’s a warmed over Republican: slightly smarter, with less of a drawl. And no Republican ever “listens”. Listening is for fruitcakes and liberals.

The question is whether the press buys what he’s selling again.

16186. stageleft said on September 4, 2008 at 6:22 pm

Apparently he did this on the tour of the country he talked about….. personally that fact that the MSM didn’t give any coverage to the northern leg of his tour through Nunavut, Nunavik, and Nunatsiavut, has proven to me that they really are biased!

… what’s that, ooops, silly me, I thought a tour of the country would include those places but I’m now being told they do not - I really should have known better, not enough seats there to matter, my bad for a lapse in thought.

Sorry the comment area are closed