8 Responded To This Post

16824. penlan said on October 12, 2008 at 10:31 am

Well I’d take what he said with a grain of salt. He says one thing & does another - as we have all seen over & over.

16826. JC Kelan said on October 12, 2008 at 11:17 am

I think the Liberals are going to be in a very difficult position after this election.

They have probably not performed well enough to form the government but, at the same time, Dion did well enough that he deserves another shot.

Like Liberal leaders before him, Dion can rightfully claim that he should get to fight one more election. After all, he seems to have secured the parties’ base, likely held on to the Official Opposition post from the NDP and resurrected the party from being wiped out in Quebec.

Also to be factored into this equation is the financial state of the party. Can they mount another leadership campaign right now? How divisive would this be for the Liberals (Iggy-Rae splitting the party just like Martin-Chretien)?

A final consideration, if Dion puts his leadership to a vote of the party faithful, he might do okay. After all, the party base is further to the left than where the party sees itself. Dion would probably have surprising strength with this group after campaigning on the carbon tax, women’s representation, Kelowna and poverty.

Do Liberals want him back? Will they go out and vote Liberal knowing that this is the outcome they will be securing?

Interesting times.

16827. wilson said on October 12, 2008 at 11:46 am

Dion just told reporters he will not step down if he loses.

Something that Liberals need to address, is representation in the West.
Libs hold 10 seats west of the Ontario border, 5 of them are too close to call.
Even if you add in the Dipper seats, a Lib/Dipper/Bloc coalition government has only, at best, 22 seats out of 308, representing 40% of the provinces.

8% representation for 40% of the country…think about it.

16828. slg said on October 12, 2008 at 12:21 pm

Personally, I think it’s a very stupid question about what the leaders will do after the election. Very stupid.

It would depend on a number of things - and face it, they aren’t going to tell what they have in mind during an election.

Harper is playing - vote for me or I’ll run away. Another tactic of trying to get votes.

But - what an opportunity for those progressive conservatives, with the help of others, to get rid of Harper and the Reform Party once and for all.

Food for thought folks.

16830. wilson said on October 12, 2008 at 1:13 pm

Forgetting of course slg, that Canadians, not just conservatives, see PMSH as the best pick for PM, and Dion 3rd behind Layton.

16831. slg said on October 12, 2008 at 1:27 pm

Ha, ha - ya, right Wilson, like anyone listens to you. LOL

Do you have any words in your vocabulary other than Harper talking points?

…na, didn’t think so.

By the way, I’ve heard there’s a new ABC campaign going on. On election night someone has suggested that you watch the coverage ABC - Anyone But CTV.

Sounds good to me.

16832. wilson said on October 12, 2008 at 1:58 pm

‘Don’t defeat us then ask us to stop a carbon tax.’ Harper

16839. Moebius said on October 12, 2008 at 5:52 pm

I would certainly expect Harper to quit if he lost an election against a weak, divided opposition. I’d be first in line asking for it, as I was with John Tory.

Mr. Dion is expecting to be the leader following the election, no matter what. I suspect the party would differ.

Sorry the comment area are closed